It’s very possible that Tameka Raymond maybe laughing in the end at Usher if she wins full custody back of the two boys she bread with Usher. Since Usher was granted full-custody of his two boys many including us were left shocked, as such a case rarely ever occurs for the man, and the talks of the judge being close with Usher’s attorney , (John Mayoue) was given reason for Usher’s child custody win.
Mayoue’s law firm donated $1,000 to the judge’s re-election campaign, and Tameka Raymond did bring up her concerns of favouritism due to “close connection,” but that was after the child custody trial had ended, and an outside hearing Tameka’s claims stated that Tameka should have made her concerns known during or before the trial and no re-trial was issued, which Tameka was seeking.
It may seem wrong to any of us for a judge to preside over a case of an attorney who donated to his/her re-election campaign, but according to reports the state of Georgia grants lawyers the right to contribute to a judge’s campaign. Still, with reported behind the door investigation, we still see a possibility of some change in Tameka’s favour. For some reason corruption claims in Raymond vs Raymond does not surprise us over hear. High profile celebrity cases always appear to have some risk of favouritism taking place.